Where is the red-footed tortoise legal?

Chelonoidis carbonarius. Restricted in 9 of the 52 jurisdictions checked. Every entry quotes the rule it comes from.

Interactive map

Alabama: no restriction found for red-footed tortoiseAlaska: no restriction found for red-footed tortoiseArizona: no restriction found for red-footed tortoiseArkansas: no restriction found for red-footed tortoiseCalifornia: no restriction found for red-footed tortoiseColorado: no restriction found for red-footed tortoiseConnecticut: no restriction found for red-footed tortoiseDelaware: permit required for red-footed tortoiseFlorida: no restriction found for red-footed tortoiseGeorgia: no restriction found for red-footed tortoiseHawaii: conditions apply for red-footed tortoiseIdaho: no restriction found for red-footed tortoiseIllinois: no restriction found for red-footed tortoiseIndiana: no restriction found for red-footed tortoiseIowa: no restriction found for red-footed tortoiseKansas: no restriction found for red-footed tortoiseKentucky: no restriction found for red-footed tortoiseLouisiana: no restriction found for red-footed tortoiseMaine: no restriction found for red-footed tortoiseMaryland: no restriction found for red-footed tortoiseMassachusetts: conditions apply for red-footed tortoiseMichigan: no restriction found for red-footed tortoiseMinnesota: conditions apply for red-footed tortoiseMississippi: no restriction found for red-footed tortoiseMissouri: no restriction found for red-footed tortoiseMontana: no restriction found for red-footed tortoiseNebraska: no restriction found for red-footed tortoiseNevada: no restriction found for red-footed tortoiseNew Hampshire: no restriction found for red-footed tortoiseNew Jersey: permit required for red-footed tortoiseNew Mexico: permit required for red-footed tortoiseNew York: no restriction found for red-footed tortoiseNorth Carolina: no restriction found for red-footed tortoiseNorth Dakota: no restriction found for red-footed tortoiseOhio: no restriction found for red-footed tortoiseOklahoma: no restriction found for red-footed tortoiseOregon: no restriction found for red-footed tortoisePennsylvania: no restriction found for red-footed tortoiseRhode Island: no restriction found for red-footed tortoiseSouth Carolina: no restriction found for red-footed tortoiseSouth Dakota: no restriction found for red-footed tortoiseTennessee: no restriction found for red-footed tortoiseTexas: no restriction found for red-footed tortoiseUtah: no restriction found for red-footed tortoiseVermont: conditions apply for red-footed tortoiseVirginia: no restriction found for red-footed tortoiseWashington: no restriction found for red-footed tortoiseWest Virginia: permit required for red-footed tortoiseWisconsin: no restriction found for red-footed tortoiseWyoming: no restriction found for red-footed tortoiseDistrict of Columbia: no restriction found for red-footed tortoise

Select a state for the rule behind its colour. Alaska, Hawaii and the District of Columbia are drawn out of position so they can be clicked. The counts include New York City, which has rules separate from the surrounding state and so cannot be shaded on a state map. Listed in full below.

What the colours mean

  • BannedNo legal way to keep one, and no permit to apply for.
  • Permit required (4)Legal, but you need a permit or license before the animal arrives.
  • Conditions apply (5)Legal without a permit only if a stated condition is met, such as a generation, a size or an indoor-only rule.
  • UnclearThe rule genuinely does not resolve for this animal. Ask the agency before relying on it.
  • No restriction found (43)This jurisdiction was read for this animal and nothing in it restricts one.
  • Not checked yetWe have not read this jurisdiction for this animal. It is not a clean bill of health, it is a gap.

Every restriction on the red-footed tortoise

9 of the 52 jurisdictions checked restrict this animal in some way. The rest had no rule we could find. Open a row for the wording of the rule and the citation behind it.

Delaware

Permit required3 Del. Admin. Code 903-6.2, with Del. Code tit. 3 § 7201
Unless specifically exempt from the permitting requirement as presented in regulation 6.1, all persons who would own or have custody of an exotic animal must first obtain a permit issued by the Department.

The red-footed tortoise is a live reptile not native to Delaware and is not on the exempt list, so regulation 6.2 requires an Individual permit before anyone may bring one in, possess, sell or exhibit it. Delaware exempts no chelonian of any kind. The permit is a $25 Individual permit from the Department of Agriculture, issued where possession will be in the public interest, so this is a real route rather than a closed door.

How this rule works: The regulation that actually decides Delaware, and it is much narrower than the list circulating in secondary sources. § 7201 requires a permit before anyone brings in, possesses, sells or exhibits a live wild mammal, a hybrid of a wild mammal, or a live reptile not native to Delaware, and bans non-native venomous snakes outright with no permit available. Regulation 6.1 then exempts a named list of pets from the permit entirely, and 6.2 says everything else needs one. The only species the State Veterinarian may not permit at all are at 4.7: gila monsters, beaded lizards and komodo dragons. Pythons, anacondas and boas appear only at 7.5.2.10, a restriction on what Sales Permit holders may breed, not a possession ban. The Delaware regulations site is a single-page app that serves no text to a fetcher, so this was read from a full reproduction and cross-checked against the Department of Agriculture's own exotic animals page.

3 Del. Admin. Code 903, Exotic Animal Regulations, with Del. Code tit. 3 § 7201 →

New Jersey

Permit requiredN.J.A.C. 7:25-4.5
A permit shall be required for any other exotic mammals, birds, reptiles, or amphibians, or nongame species not specifically exempted by N.J.A.C. 7:25-4.4.

New Jersey is a closed-list state in the strict sense. 7:25-4.2(a) bars possession of any exotic or nongame species without a permit, 4.4 then names the handful that may be kept without one, and 4.5 sweeps everything else back in. The red-footed tortoise appears on none of the Division's three lists, so it is not exempt under 4.4, not one of the families singled out in 4.3, and not potentially dangerous under 4.8. That leaves 4.5, and the permit it points to is the individual hobby permit at 4.6(a)1, which 4.7 conditions on diet, caging that prevents escape, lawful acquisition, veterinary care and freedom from disease. The Division's own handout tells readers to phone the permits office for anything the lists do not name, which is a fair signal that the catch-all is where these end up rather than an oversight.

How this rule works: NJDEP's own courtesy copy of the whole of N.J.A.C. 7:25. Subchapter 4 starts at 7:25-4.1 and carries the definitions, the permit requirement at 4.2, the three species lists at 4.3, 4.4 and 4.8, the pet bar at 4.9(a)3 and 4.15(b), and the state endangered list at 4.13. The three list PDFs the Division hands out are extracts of this.

N.J.A.C. 7:25 Subchapter 4, Endangered, Nongame and Exotic Wildlife →

New Mexico

Permit requiredDirector's Species Importation List, 2023
Rep/Amph | Turtle | Testudinidae | Geochelone carbonaria | Tortoise, Red-foot | II

Group II on the Director's list: not known to be invasive or dangerous, but an importation permit is still required before the animal may be brought into New Mexico. Listed under the older genus Geochelone, now Chelonoidis. One caveat on all of this: 19.35.7 NMAC is an importation rule, its stated scope being persons who desire to bring wildlife species into New Mexico, so it governs getting the animal here rather than keeping one already in the state.

How this rule works: The roughly 1,300 row table that 19.35.7 NMAC points at and that earlier research could not obtain. Every row gives a family, a scientific name, a common name and a roman numeral group. Group I is semi-domesticated and needs no importation permit. Group II is not known to be invasive or dangerous and needs a permit. Group III presents minimal or manageable concerns and needs a permit with specific provisions attached. Group IV is prohibited to the general public. The list is reached from the download page rather than a direct file URL, and the site needs a User-Agent header.

New Mexico Department of Game and Fish, Director's Species Importation List, updated January 2023 →

West Virginia

Permit requiredW. Va. Code § 20-2-13; § 20-1-2; § 20-2-4(a), (b)
No person shall transport into or have in his possession within this state any live wildlife or viable eggs thereof from without the state, except as authorized by an importation permit issued by the director

West Virginia’s importation section is the rule the rest of this column was written without, and it changes the answer for every exotic reptile and amphibian in it. W. Va. Code § 20-1-2 builds wildlife out of wild birds, wild animals, game and fur-bearing animals, fish, reptiles, amphibians, mollusks, crustaceans and all forms of aquatic life used as fish bait. The reptile and amphibian clause carries no nativity qualifier and no captive-bred carve-out, so a pet reptile or amphibian bought from an out-of-state breeder is live wildlife from without the state. A red-footed tortoise is a reptile and a South American species, so it is wildlife from without the state on any route into West Virginia. § 20-2-13 then bars both bringing that animal in and having it in possession within the state except under an importation permit from the director, and the permit is discretionary: the director may issue it, fix its terms and revoke it at his pleasure. How firm this is, both ways. § 20-2-4(a) independently makes it unlawful to take, obtain, purchase, possess or maintain in captivity any live wildlife except as the chapter or a rule provides, and § 20-2-4(b) says wildlife lawfully taken outside of this state is subject to the same laws and rules as wildlife taken within it, which closes the argument that an out-of-state origin puts the animal outside the chapter before it is made. Against that, the section is headed importation and certification and the body of it is disease control, fish pathologist certificates and inspection of imported shipments, with the only penalty clause written for coyotes. Nothing in Title 58 implements § 20-2-13 for anything but aquaculture, and WVDNR publishes no application for an importation permit. So this is a statutory permit requirement that is real on paper with its machinery not visibly in place, which is the same shape as the Minnesota breeder condition and is recorded the same way. Neither of West Virginia’s two species lists bars this animal. W. Va. C.S.R. § 74-1-3, the dangerous wild animal list adopted 5 April 2022, is a mammal list plus the Komodo dragon. W. Va. C.S.R. § 58-73 reaches native West Virginia reptiles and amphibians only.

How this rule works: West Virginia splits its animals by two definitions in one section. Wildlife takes in reptiles, amphibians, mollusks and crustaceans with no nativity limit and no terrestrial arthropod at all. Wild animals means all mammals native to the State of West Virginia, which is the phrase that decides every mammal here. § 20-2-4 bars possessing either except as the chapter or a rule provides, and § 20-2-51 is the only pet route, a two dollar permit from the director.

W. Va. Code § 20-1-2 (definitions), § 20-2-4 (possession of wildlife), § 20-2-13 (importation) and § 20-2-51 (permit for keeping pets) →

Hawaii

Conditions applyList of Conditionally Approved Animals, Family Testudinidae
Chelonoidis (all species in genus except C. elephantopus)

Confirmed directly from the HDOA conditional-animal-list PDF. Unlike the sulcata (which moved out of Geochelone entirely into the unlisted genus Centrochelys, leaving its status genuinely unclear), the red-footed tortoise's current genus Chelonoidis is named outright on this list, with only the Galapagos tortoise (C. elephantopus, separately restricted) carved out. Chelonoidis carbonarius is squarely covered.

How this rule works: The list that matters most for pet keepers and the one almost never quoted. Conditional approval means importation and possession are allowed subject to the conditions the Board of Agriculture sets, unlike the restricted list, which is research and exhibition only.

Hawaii Administrative Rules, List of Conditionally Approved Animals (Hawaii Department of Agriculture official PDF) →

Massachusetts

Conditions apply321 CMR 9.01(10)(a)
All species of turtles may be kept without a permit, up to a limit of 100 turtles and/or eggs, in any combination, of each species, except for the following species for which a permit is always required: 1. Species categorically non-exempt pursuant to 321 CMR 9.01(3). 2. Argentina or Chaco Tortoise (Geochelone chilensis). 3. Gopher Tortoises (Gopherus polyphemus) and all other species in the genus Gopherus. 4. Pancake Tortoise (Malacochersus tornieri). 5. Spotted Turtle (Clemmys guttata). 6. Red-eared Slider (Trachemys scripta, including all subspecies and forms).

Falls under the general turtle allowance: no permit, capped at 100 of the species in any combination of animals and eggs, which is a dealer-scale limit rather than a keeper-scale one. The categorical bar is worth checking here and comes out clean on the current IUCN checklist, which carries no assessment for Chelonoidis carbonarius; the older 1996 assessment was published under Geochelone carbonaria and is not on the current list. That makes this a thinner answer than the other tortoises on this row, and a reassessment would move it into the permit tier without any change to Massachusetts law.

How this rule works: Massachusetts runs a closed white list and says so in terms: a species not on it, or listed as requiring a permit, is not exempt from M.G.L. c. 131, § 23. Two structural points decide most of this state. First, 9.01(2) defines "species" as a "distinct non-domestic VERTEBRATE animal population", and § 23 itself reaches only fish, birds, mammals, reptiles and amphibians, so terrestrial invertebrates are outside the scheme entirely. Second, 9.01(3) is a categorical override that most readings of this rule miss: no species may be exempted if it is listed under the federal Endangered Species Act, appears in the IUCN Red Book(s), or is on the Massachusetts endangered, threatened and special concern list at 321 CMR 10.90. Nearly every group listing in 9.01 repeats the cross-reference, so it operates as a live carve-out rather than as drafting furniture, and it is what pulls the Burmese python out of Boidae, the crested gecko out of Gekkonidae and the box turtle out of the turtle allowance.

321 CMR 9.00, Exotic Wildlife: 9.01 Exemption List and 9.02 List of Domestic Animals →

Minnesota

Conditions apply§ 97C.605, subds. 1 and 2c
A person may not take, possess, or transport turtles without a resident angling license and a recreational turtle license. ... A person does not need the licenses specified under subdivision 1: ... (2) when buying a turtle at a retail outlet

Turtles are the gap in the 2021 pet reptile rule. Section 97A.401, subd. 8 covers snakes, lizards and salamanders and stops there, so turtles stay under their own older regime, which is a licence requirement with a short list of exemptions rather than a source condition. Whether a red-footed tortoise is a "turtle" for this section is not spelled out, since Minnesota never defines the word and its turtle rules are plainly written around aquatic natives. It does not matter much in practice: read broadly, the retail outlet exemption in subd. 2c covers a pet-shop animal anyway, and read narrowly the section does not reach it at all. Either way no licence is needed for one bought at retail, and the species is on neither invasive species list.

How this rule works: Turtles are handled apart from the 2021 snake, lizard and salamander rule and were not included in it. Subd. 1 requires an angling licence plus a recreational turtle licence to take, possess or transport turtles; subd. 2c exempts, among others, buying a turtle at a retail outlet, which is what leaves a pet-shop turtle or tortoise unlicensed.

Minn. Stat. § 97C.605, Turtles →

New York City

Conditions apply§ 161.01(b)(10)
Reptiles (Reptilia). All Helodermatidae ...; all front-fanged venomous snakes, even if devenomized ...; all venomous, mid-or rear-fanged, Duvernoy-glanded members of the family Colubridae, even if devenomized; any member, or hybrid offspring of the family Boidae, including, but not limited to, the common or green anaconda and yellow anaconda; any member of the family Pythonidae, including, but not limited to, the African rock python, Indian or Burmese python, Amethystine or scrub python; any member of the family Varanidae, including the white throated monitor, Bosc's or African savannah monitor, Komodo monitor or dragon, Nile monitor, crocodile monitor, water monitor, Bornean earless monitor; any member of the family Iguanidae, including the green or common iguana; any member of the family teiidae, including, but not limited to, the golden, common, or black and white tegu; all members of the family Chelydridae, including snapping turtle and alligator snapping turtle; all turtles and tortoises with a carapace length of less than four (4) inches; and all members of the order Crocodylia ...

New York City draws its turtle line by size rather than by species: the reptile clause ends with "all turtles and tortoises with a carapace length of less than four (4) inches". The red-footed tortoise is not otherwise named, so an adult is lawful and a hatchling is not, and the animal grows out of the prohibition rather than into it. The four-inch figure is the same one the federal rule at 21 C.F.R. 1240.62 uses, and the reason is the same: small turtles are the ones children put in their mouths. § 161.01(d) is worth knowing alongside the prohibition: a prohibited animal may be seized by any authorized city employee, the owner has three business days to request a hearing, and with the Department's written consent the animal may be removed to a jurisdiction where it is not prohibited. That last provision is the closest thing to relief in the article.

How this rule works: A city rule that is stricter than any state on this map, and it works in three layers. It opens with a standard rather than a list, deeming a wild animal to be "any animal which is naturally inclined to do harm and capable of inflicting harm upon human beings". It then adds, at (b)(ii), any wildlife protected or endangered under federal, STATE or local law, which imports New York State's protected wildlife scheme into the city wholesale. And it closes with 24 numbered clauses that work mostly by family: all cats other than Felis catus and their hybrids, all dogs other than Canis familiaris, all Mustelidae including the ferret by name, all squirrels, all marsupials, all large rodents, all Boidae, all Pythonidae, all Varanidae, all Iguanidae, all teiidae, all Chelydridae, all venomous spiders including the tarantula by name, and all turtles under four inches. § 161.01(c) is the short answer to what is left: gerbil, hamster, guinea pig, domesticated rabbit, and small birds such as parakeet, parrot, canary and finch.

New York City Health Code § 161.01, Wild and other animals prohibited →

Vermont

Conditions applyUnrestricted Wild Animal List, July 2025
Testudines | Testudinidae | Geochelone | carbonaria | Red-footed tortoise (Captive Bred Only)

Unrestricted under its older name Geochelone carbonaria, now Chelonoidis carbonarius, and subject to the same Captive Bred Only condition, which requires a statement of origin or certificate of veterinary inspection on import. Only three chelonians are on the whole Unrestricted list, so this is a narrow permission.

How this rule works: The list the whole Vermont answer turns on, and the one earlier research could not obtain. Anything on it may be kept with no permit. Its closing line is the important part: species not found on the Restricted, Unrestricted or Domestic species lists are considered Restricted, which makes Vermont an inverted-list state like Hawaii. Several entries are marked Captive Bred Only, which is a real condition rather than a note. The site refuses automated requests without a User-Agent header.

Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department, Unrestricted Wild Animal List, July 2025 →

For the full write-up, including the states that get reported wrongly, read the red-footed tortoise legal guide.

Past the legal question? See the red-footed tortoise profile.

Cite this page

Every entry here is quoted from the statute or regulation it comes from, with the date it was last read against the published text.

How to read this

Two of the shades mean very different things and are worth telling apart. A flat grey state was read for this animal and nothing in it restricts one. A dotted state has not been read for this animal at all. Coverage runs from two jurisdictions to fifty-one depending on the species, so on a less-researched animal most of the map is a gap in our work rather than a finding, and it should not be taken as permission.

Even a flat grey is not a guarantee. It means no restriction was found in the specific body of law checked for that state, which is recorded alongside each jurisdiction. Cities and counties regularly ban animals their state allows, and several states say so in their own rules.

Hatched grey means the rule genuinely does not resolve. Usually a definition arguably reaches the animal without naming it, and the honest answer is to ask the agency rather than to guess. Those entries are marked unclear on purpose rather than being rounded to a yes or a no.

Every entry links to the regulation it came from. None of this is legal advice, laws change without much notice, and the agency that issues the permit is always the last word. For the federal layer and how state schemes are structured, see the exotic pet legal hub.