Where is the ackie monitor legal?

Varanus acanthurus. Restricted in 12 of the 52 jurisdictions checked. Every entry quotes the rule it comes from.

Interactive map

Alabama: no restriction found for ackie monitorAlaska: no restriction found for ackie monitorArizona: no restriction found for ackie monitorArkansas: no restriction found for ackie monitorCalifornia: no restriction found for ackie monitorColorado: unclear for ackie monitorConnecticut: no restriction found for ackie monitorDelaware: permit required for ackie monitorFlorida: no restriction found for ackie monitorGeorgia: no restriction found for ackie monitorHawaii: banned for ackie monitorIdaho: no restriction found for ackie monitorIllinois: no restriction found for ackie monitorIndiana: no restriction found for ackie monitorIowa: no restriction found for ackie monitorKansas: no restriction found for ackie monitorKentucky: no restriction found for ackie monitorLouisiana: no restriction found for ackie monitorMaine: permit required for ackie monitorMaryland: no restriction found for ackie monitorMassachusetts: no restriction found for ackie monitorMichigan: no restriction found for ackie monitorMinnesota: conditions apply for ackie monitorMississippi: no restriction found for ackie monitorMissouri: no restriction found for ackie monitorMontana: no restriction found for ackie monitorNebraska: no restriction found for ackie monitorNevada: no restriction found for ackie monitorNew Hampshire: no restriction found for ackie monitorNew Jersey: permit required for ackie monitorNew Mexico: banned for ackie monitorNew York: no restriction found for ackie monitorNorth Carolina: no restriction found for ackie monitorNorth Dakota: no restriction found for ackie monitorOhio: no restriction found for ackie monitorOklahoma: no restriction found for ackie monitorOregon: no restriction found for ackie monitorPennsylvania: no restriction found for ackie monitorRhode Island: permit required for ackie monitorSouth Carolina: no restriction found for ackie monitorSouth Dakota: no restriction found for ackie monitorTennessee: no restriction found for ackie monitorTexas: no restriction found for ackie monitorUtah: no restriction found for ackie monitorVermont: permit required for ackie monitorVirginia: no restriction found for ackie monitorWashington: no restriction found for ackie monitorWest Virginia: permit required for ackie monitorWisconsin: no restriction found for ackie monitorWyoming: no restriction found for ackie monitorDistrict of Columbia: banned for ackie monitor

Select a state for the rule behind its colour. Alaska, Hawaii and the District of Columbia are drawn out of position so they can be clicked. The counts include New York City, which has rules separate from the surrounding state and so cannot be shaded on a state map. Listed in full below.

What the colours mean

  • Banned (4)No legal way to keep one, and no permit to apply for.
  • Permit required (6)Legal, but you need a permit or license before the animal arrives.
  • Conditions apply (1)Legal without a permit only if a stated condition is met, such as a generation, a size or an indoor-only rule.
  • Unclear (1)The rule genuinely does not resolve for this animal. Ask the agency before relying on it.
  • No restriction found (40)This jurisdiction was read for this animal and nothing in it restricts one.
  • Not checked yetWe have not read this jurisdiction for this animal. It is not a clean bill of health, it is a gap.

Every restriction on the ackie monitor

12 of the 52 jurisdictions checked restrict this animal in some way. The rest had no rule we could find. Open a row for the wording of the rule and the citation behind it.

District of Columbia

Banned§ 8-1808(j)(1)
Non-venomous snakes, fish, and turtles, traditionally kept in the home for pleasure rather than for commercial purposes

No lizard fits any of the seven permitted categories, the same finding already documented for the savannah monitor.

How this rule works: A closed list and one of the shortest in the country. Subsection (j)(1) bars importing, possessing, displaying, selling, trading or giving as a household pet "any living member of the animal kingdom, including those born or raised in captivity", except seven categories: domestic dogs, domestic cats, domesticated rodents and rabbits, captive-bred common cage birds, non-venomous snakes and fish and turtles, ferrets, and racing pigeons. No lizard, no amphibian and no invertebrate fits any of them. Read from the D.C. Code rather than from a reproduction: the seven categories and their exact wording are what every cell in this jurisdiction turns on.

D.C. Code § 8-1808(j), Prohibited conduct →

Hawaii

Banned§ 4-71-6.5, Restricted Animal List Part A
Varanus acanthurus monitor, spiny-tailed

Confirmed directly from the HDOA restricted-animal-list (Part A) PDF. Part A is headed FOR RESEARCH AND EXHIBITION; a university or licensed exhibitor can hold one by permit, but no pet permit path exists, the same treatment as the savannah and Nile monitor.

How this rule works: Part A animals may be brought in by a university or a licensed exhibitor under permit and may not be kept as pets. Part B, published separately as AR-71RB, is the private and commercial use list and was checked as well: it runs to hoofed stock, giraffes, otters, seals, macropods and three named parrots, and contains none of the animals in this dataset.

Hawaii Administrative Rules § 4-71-6.5, List of Restricted Animals, Part A (research and exhibition) →

New Mexico

BannedDirector's Species Importation List, 2023
Any species of live non-domesticated animal not currently on the species importation list will be designated group IV until such time as another determination is made by the director.

The ackie monitor is not on the list. Only five monitors are, the Indian, yellow, desert, Komodo and green tree, and the first four are Group IV outright. Everything else in Varanidae falls to the default clause and is designated group IV. Group IV importation is prohibited for the general public and allowed only for scientific study, department approved restoration, zoological display, temporary events, use as a service animal, or by a qualified expert. One caveat on all of this: 19.35.7 NMAC is an importation rule, its stated scope being persons who desire to bring wildlife species into New Mexico, so it governs getting the animal here rather than keeping one already in the state.

How this rule works: The roughly 1,300 row table that 19.35.7 NMAC points at and that earlier research could not obtain. Every row gives a family, a scientific name, a common name and a roman numeral group. Group I is semi-domesticated and needs no importation permit. Group II is not known to be invasive or dangerous and needs a permit. Group III presents minimal or manageable concerns and needs a permit with specific provisions attached. Group IV is prohibited to the general public. The list is reached from the download page rather than a direct file URL, and the site needs a User-Agent header.

New Mexico Department of Game and Fish, Director's Species Importation List, updated January 2023 →

New York City

Banned§ 161.01(b)(10)
Reptiles (Reptilia). All Helodermatidae ...; all front-fanged venomous snakes, even if devenomized ...; all venomous, mid-or rear-fanged, Duvernoy-glanded members of the family Colubridae, even if devenomized; any member, or hybrid offspring of the family Boidae, including, but not limited to, the common or green anaconda and yellow anaconda; any member of the family Pythonidae, including, but not limited to, the African rock python, Indian or Burmese python, Amethystine or scrub python; any member of the family Varanidae, including the white throated monitor, Bosc's or African savannah monitor, Komodo monitor or dragon, Nile monitor, crocodile monitor, water monitor, Bornean earless monitor; any member of the family Iguanidae, including the green or common iguana; any member of the family teiidae, including, but not limited to, the golden, common, or black and white tegu; all members of the family Chelydridae, including snapping turtle and alligator snapping turtle; all turtles and tortoises with a carapace length of less than four (4) inches; and all members of the order Crocodylia ...

Not named, and it makes no difference: the clause is "any member of the family Varanidae". The ackie is the smallest monitor in the pet trade and is prohibited on the same words as the Komodo dragon. § 161.01(d) is worth knowing alongside the prohibition: a prohibited animal may be seized by any authorized city employee, the owner has three business days to request a hearing, and with the Department's written consent the animal may be removed to a jurisdiction where it is not prohibited. That last provision is the closest thing to relief in the article.

How this rule works: A city rule that is stricter than any state on this map, and it works in three layers. It opens with a standard rather than a list, deeming a wild animal to be "any animal which is naturally inclined to do harm and capable of inflicting harm upon human beings". It then adds, at (b)(ii), any wildlife protected or endangered under federal, STATE or local law, which imports New York State's protected wildlife scheme into the city wholesale. And it closes with 24 numbered clauses that work mostly by family: all cats other than Felis catus and their hybrids, all dogs other than Canis familiaris, all Mustelidae including the ferret by name, all squirrels, all marsupials, all large rodents, all Boidae, all Pythonidae, all Varanidae, all Iguanidae, all teiidae, all Chelydridae, all venomous spiders including the tarantula by name, and all turtles under four inches. § 161.01(c) is the short answer to what is left: gerbil, hamster, guinea pig, domesticated rabbit, and small birds such as parakeet, parrot, canary and finch.

New York City Health Code § 161.01, Wild and other animals prohibited →

Delaware

Permit required3 Del. Admin. Code 903-6.2, with Del. Code tit. 3 § 7201
Unless specifically exempt from the permitting requirement as presented in regulation 6.1, all persons who would own or have custody of an exotic animal must first obtain a permit issued by the Department.

The ackie monitor is a live reptile not native to Delaware and is not on the exempt list, so regulation 6.2 requires an Individual permit before anyone may bring one in, possess, sell or exhibit it. No monitor appears on the exempt list, and the Komodo dragon is the one varanid Delaware refuses to permit at all, so the family is treated with some care here. The permit is a $25 Individual permit from the Department of Agriculture, issued where possession will be in the public interest, so this is a real route rather than a closed door.

How this rule works: The regulation that actually decides Delaware, and it is much narrower than the list circulating in secondary sources. § 7201 requires a permit before anyone brings in, possesses, sells or exhibits a live wild mammal, a hybrid of a wild mammal, or a live reptile not native to Delaware, and bans non-native venomous snakes outright with no permit available. Regulation 6.1 then exempts a named list of pets from the permit entirely, and 6.2 says everything else needs one. The only species the State Veterinarian may not permit at all are at 4.7: gila monsters, beaded lizards and komodo dragons. Pythons, anacondas and boas appear only at 7.5.2.10, a restriction on what Sales Permit holders may breed, not a possession ban. The Delaware regulations site is a single-page app that serves no text to a fetcher, so this was read from a full reproduction and cross-checked against the Department of Agriculture's own exotic animals page.

3 Del. Admin. Code 903, Exotic Animal Regulations, with Del. Code tit. 3 § 7201 →

Maine

Permit requiredUnrestricted Species List

Maine's clean list names only Varanus exanthematicus (savannah monitor) among monitors (documented in this site's savannah-monitor research). Varanus acanthurus is absent, so it falls back to Maine's general importation/possession permit requirement rather than the no-permit list. Whether an individual permit is actually issued for a pet Ackie was not separately confirmed.

How this rule works: The list 12 M.R.S. § 12152(1-A) requires the department to maintain and 09-137 CMR ch. 7 § 7.06(1) describes: species needing no importation, exhibition, propagation, research or possession permit, which pet shops may also trade. Dated 11 August 2017 on every page, and this is the version IFW still serves. Three headings do most of the work: Reptilia, Serpentes and Testudines each carry "Captive Bred Origin Only", and an asterisk on an entry removes anything on the USFWS injurious or threatened and endangered lists, in CITES Appendix I, or on the IUCN Red List as Endangered, Critically Endangered or Extinct in the Wild.

Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife, Unrestricted Species List →

New Jersey

Permit requiredN.J.A.C. 7:25-4.3(a)3.ix
Reptiles: ... ix. Monitor - Varanus spp.;

The ackie monitor is answered by name on the 4.3 permit list rather than by the catch-all. Varanus acanthurus is inside the genus entry "Monitor - Varanus spp.". The list is written by family as often as by species, and 4.3 is open-ended, "include, but are not limited to", so being on it settles the permit question but not being on it settles nothing. The permit is the individual hobby permit at 4.6(a)1, subject to the general possession criteria at 4.7. The ackie is the monitor most often kept because it stays small, and New Jersey gives it the same answer as the Nile monitor, so the usual argument that a dwarf species should be treated differently has nothing to attach to in the text.

How this rule works: The Division's handout of the 4.3 permit list. It is open-ended, 'include, but are not limited to', and works by family as often as by species, so Pythonidae, Boidae, Lampropeltis, Varanus, Scincidae and Gekkonidae each answer several pet species at once.

N.J.A.C. 7:25-4.3 Exotic Species and Nongame species requiring a permit for possession →

Rhode Island

Permit required§ 3.17(A)(4)(c)(1)
Possession of the Gila Monster, Beaded Lizard (Heloderatidae), and all Monitors (Varanidae) requires an exotic animal possession permit.

How this rule works: One of the most species-specific schemes in the country. § 3.6 defines domestic animals, § 3.7 sets general prohibitions, § 3.9 governs permits, and § 3.17 is the long exempt list of animals that need no exotic animal possession permit. Anything not domestic, not native and not on the § 3.17 list needs a permit.

250-RICR-40-05-3, Rules and Regulations Governing the Importation and Possession of Wild Animals →

Vermont

Permit requiredUnrestricted Wild Animal List, July 2025, and Regulation 881
Species not found on the Restricted, Unrestricted or Domestic species lists are considered Restricted.

The ackie monitor is on neither the Unrestricted nor the Restricted list, and Vermont treats that absence as a restriction rather than a gap. Only four monitors are unrestricted by name, the short-tailed pygmy, the savannah, the dwarf and the Timor. Varanus acanthurus is not one of them. A permit exists on paper but not for a pet: Regulation 881 says the Commissioner shall not issue a permit for keeping or possessing a wild animal in captivity except for bona fide scientific or educational purposes. So restricted here means a private keeper cannot have one, not that there is paperwork to fill in.

How this rule works: The list the whole Vermont answer turns on, and the one earlier research could not obtain. Anything on it may be kept with no permit. Its closing line is the important part: species not found on the Restricted, Unrestricted or Domestic species lists are considered Restricted, which makes Vermont an inverted-list state like Hawaii. Several entries are marked Captive Bred Only, which is a real condition rather than a note. The site refuses automated requests without a User-Agent header.

Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department, Unrestricted Wild Animal List, July 2025 →

West Virginia

Permit requiredW. Va. Code § 20-2-13; § 20-1-2; § 20-2-4(a), (b)
No person shall transport into or have in his possession within this state any live wildlife or viable eggs thereof from without the state, except as authorized by an importation permit issued by the director

West Virginia’s importation section is the rule the rest of this column was written without, and it changes the answer for every exotic reptile and amphibian in it. W. Va. Code § 20-1-2 builds wildlife out of wild birds, wild animals, game and fur-bearing animals, fish, reptiles, amphibians, mollusks, crustaceans and all forms of aquatic life used as fish bait. The reptile and amphibian clause carries no nativity qualifier and no captive-bred carve-out, so a pet reptile or amphibian bought from an out-of-state breeder is live wildlife from without the state. An ackie monitor is a reptile and an Australian species, so it is wildlife from without the state on any route into West Virginia. § 20-2-13 then bars both bringing that animal in and having it in possession within the state except under an importation permit from the director, and the permit is discretionary: the director may issue it, fix its terms and revoke it at his pleasure. How firm this is, both ways. § 20-2-4(a) independently makes it unlawful to take, obtain, purchase, possess or maintain in captivity any live wildlife except as the chapter or a rule provides, and § 20-2-4(b) says wildlife lawfully taken outside of this state is subject to the same laws and rules as wildlife taken within it, which closes the argument that an out-of-state origin puts the animal outside the chapter before it is made. Against that, the section is headed importation and certification and the body of it is disease control, fish pathologist certificates and inspection of imported shipments, with the only penalty clause written for coyotes. Nothing in Title 58 implements § 20-2-13 for anything but aquaculture, and WVDNR publishes no application for an importation permit. So this is a statutory permit requirement that is real on paper with its machinery not visibly in place, which is the same shape as the Minnesota breeder condition and is recorded the same way. Neither of West Virginia’s two species lists bars this animal. W. Va. C.S.R. § 74-1-3, the dangerous wild animal list adopted 5 April 2022, is a mammal list plus the Komodo dragon. W. Va. C.S.R. § 58-73 reaches native West Virginia reptiles and amphibians only.

How this rule works: West Virginia splits its animals by two definitions in one section. Wildlife takes in reptiles, amphibians, mollusks and crustaceans with no nativity limit and no terrestrial arthropod at all. Wild animals means all mammals native to the State of West Virginia, which is the phrase that decides every mammal here. § 20-2-4 bars possessing either except as the chapter or a rule provides, and § 20-2-51 is the only pet route, a two dollar permit from the director.

W. Va. Code § 20-1-2 (definitions), § 20-2-4 (possession of wildlife), § 20-2-13 (importation) and § 20-2-51 (permit for keeping pets) →

Minnesota

Conditions apply§ 97A.401, subd. 8
The commissioner must prescribe conditions and may issue permits to breed, propagate, and sell snakes, lizards, and salamanders. A snake, lizard, or salamander that is obtained from a permitted breeder or that was possessed before August 1, 2021, may be possessed as a pet.

Minnesota gets here in three steps, and the surprise is that none of them turns on the species being native. Section 97A.015, subd. 55 defines wild animals as creatures wild by nature and includes reptiles, with no geographic limit. Subd. 39 makes snakes, lizards and salamanders protected wild animals as whole categories. Section 97A.501, subd. 1 then bars possessing a protected wild animal unless the game and fish laws allow it, and this subdivision is the allowance. A ackie monitor is a lizard, so the breeder-source condition applies to it as much as to a Minnesota native. Two things to know about how firm this is. The statute says the commissioner "must" prescribe conditions, but there is no snake, lizard or salamander breeder permit on the DNR's permits page, Minnesota Rules chapter 6256 covers only frogs and turtles, and no rule chapter implements the subdivision. And the DNR's own pet-trade page describes the change as reaching "wild collected Minnesota snakes, lizards, and/or salamanders", which is narrower than the statute's words and does not mention the breeder permit at all. So the condition is real on paper and its machinery is not visibly in place.

How this rule works: Subd. 8, added in 2021, is the pet reptile rule: the commissioner must prescribe conditions and may issue breeder permits, and a snake, lizard or salamander is possessable as a pet if it came from a permitted breeder or was held before 1 August 2021. Subd. 3 is the older, broader route, allowing special permits without a fee to possess wild animals as pets.

Minn. Stat. § 97A.401, Special permits →

Colorado

UnclearAppendix A(B)(19); § 700(G)
"Tropical and subtropical region" means the region between 26.0 degrees north latitude and 26.0 degrees south latitude.

Varanidae is on Appendix A, but only for monitors native only to the tropical and subtropical region, and § 700(G) fixes that region at 26.0 degrees north to 26.0 degrees south. The ackie monitor's range across northern and central Western Australia and inland Queensland reaches roughly that latitude, so it sits on the line the rule draws rather than clearly inside it. CPW has published determinations for six monitors, the savannah, Nile, black-throated, blue-spotted tree, crocodile and Asian water monitors, and none for Varanus acanthurus, and its list is expressly not exhaustive. Recorded unclear rather than legal because the qualifier is species-specific and this species is the one it is hardest to call. CPW takes the question by email for exactly this situation.

How this rule works: Secretary of State's official text of the new herpetofauna chapter, effective 1 May 2026. A closed-list scheme: #701 makes possession of any live reptile or amphibian unlawful unless the chapter allows it, Appendix A is free possession, Appendix B is free possession with documentation, Appendix C is wild collection under a resident licence, and anything on none of them is regulated wildlife.

Colorado 2 CCR 406-7, Chapter W-7, Herpetofauna →

For the full write-up, including the states that get reported wrongly, read the ackie monitor legal guide.

Past the legal question? See the ackie monitor profile.

Cite this page

Every entry here is quoted from the statute or regulation it comes from, with the date it was last read against the published text.

How to read this

Two of the shades mean very different things and are worth telling apart. A flat grey state was read for this animal and nothing in it restricts one. A dotted state has not been read for this animal at all. Coverage runs from two jurisdictions to fifty-one depending on the species, so on a less-researched animal most of the map is a gap in our work rather than a finding, and it should not be taken as permission.

Even a flat grey is not a guarantee. It means no restriction was found in the specific body of law checked for that state, which is recorded alongside each jurisdiction. Cities and counties regularly ban animals their state allows, and several states say so in their own rules.

Hatched grey means the rule genuinely does not resolve. Usually a definition arguably reaches the animal without naming it, and the honest answer is to ask the agency rather than to guess. Those entries are marked unclear on purpose rather than being rounded to a yes or a no.

Every entry links to the regulation it came from. None of this is legal advice, laws change without much notice, and the agency that issues the permit is always the last word. For the federal layer and how state schemes are structured, see the exotic pet legal hub.