Where is the blue-tongue skink legal?

Tiliqua scincoides. Restricted in 6 of the 52 jurisdictions checked. Every entry quotes the rule it comes from.

Interactive map

Alabama: no restriction found for blue-tongue skinkAlaska: no restriction found for blue-tongue skinkArizona: no restriction found for blue-tongue skinkArkansas: no restriction found for blue-tongue skinkCalifornia: no restriction found for blue-tongue skinkColorado: no restriction found for blue-tongue skinkConnecticut: no restriction found for blue-tongue skinkDelaware: no restriction found for blue-tongue skinkFlorida: no restriction found for blue-tongue skinkGeorgia: no restriction found for blue-tongue skinkHawaii: banned for blue-tongue skinkIdaho: no restriction found for blue-tongue skinkIllinois: no restriction found for blue-tongue skinkIndiana: no restriction found for blue-tongue skinkIowa: no restriction found for blue-tongue skinkKansas: no restriction found for blue-tongue skinkKentucky: no restriction found for blue-tongue skinkLouisiana: no restriction found for blue-tongue skinkMaine: conditions apply for blue-tongue skinkMaryland: no restriction found for blue-tongue skinkMassachusetts: no restriction found for blue-tongue skinkMichigan: no restriction found for blue-tongue skinkMinnesota: conditions apply for blue-tongue skinkMississippi: no restriction found for blue-tongue skinkMissouri: no restriction found for blue-tongue skinkMontana: no restriction found for blue-tongue skinkNebraska: no restriction found for blue-tongue skinkNevada: no restriction found for blue-tongue skinkNew Hampshire: no restriction found for blue-tongue skinkNew Jersey: permit required for blue-tongue skinkNew Mexico: no restriction found for blue-tongue skinkNew York: no restriction found for blue-tongue skinkNorth Carolina: no restriction found for blue-tongue skinkNorth Dakota: no restriction found for blue-tongue skinkOhio: no restriction found for blue-tongue skinkOklahoma: no restriction found for blue-tongue skinkOregon: no restriction found for blue-tongue skinkPennsylvania: no restriction found for blue-tongue skinkRhode Island: no restriction found for blue-tongue skinkSouth Carolina: no restriction found for blue-tongue skinkSouth Dakota: no restriction found for blue-tongue skinkTennessee: no restriction found for blue-tongue skinkTexas: no restriction found for blue-tongue skinkUtah: no restriction found for blue-tongue skinkVermont: no restriction found for blue-tongue skinkVirginia: no restriction found for blue-tongue skinkWashington: no restriction found for blue-tongue skinkWest Virginia: permit required for blue-tongue skinkWisconsin: no restriction found for blue-tongue skinkWyoming: no restriction found for blue-tongue skinkDistrict of Columbia: banned for blue-tongue skink

Select a state for the rule behind its colour. Alaska, Hawaii and the District of Columbia are drawn out of position so they can be clicked.

What the colours mean

  • Banned (2)No legal way to keep one, and no permit to apply for.
  • Permit required (2)Legal, but you need a permit or license before the animal arrives.
  • Conditions apply (2)Legal without a permit only if a stated condition is met, such as a generation, a size or an indoor-only rule.
  • UnclearThe rule genuinely does not resolve for this animal. Ask the agency before relying on it.
  • No restriction found (46)This jurisdiction was read for this animal and nothing in it restricts one.
  • Not checked yetWe have not read this jurisdiction for this animal. It is not a clean bill of health, it is a gap.

Every restriction on the blue-tongue skink

6 of the 52 jurisdictions checked restrict this animal in some way. The rest had no rule we could find. Open a row for the wording of the rule and the citation behind it.

District of Columbia

Banned§ 8-1808(j)(1)
Except as provided in this subsection, a person shall not import into the District, possess, display, offer for sale, trade, barter, exchange, or adoption, or give as a household pet, any living member of the animal kingdom, including those born or raised in captivity, except the following: (A) Domestic dogs, excluding hybrids with wolves, coyotes, or jackals; (B) Domestic cats, excluding hybrids with ocelots or margays; (C) Domesticated rodents and rabbits; (D) Captive-bred species of common cage birds, including chickens; (E) Non-venomous snakes, fish, and turtles, traditionally kept in the home for pleasure rather than for commercial purposes; (F) Ferrets; and (G) Racing pigeons, when kept in compliance with permit requirements.

No lizard fits any of the seven permitted categories. The clause is a bar with seven exceptions and no permit behind it: subsections (j)(2) to (j)(5) reach public zoos, federally licensed exhibitors, rehabilitators, veterinarians, shelters, and goats and sheep brought in to eat grass. There is no route for a private keeper.

How this rule works: A closed list and one of the shortest in the country. Subsection (j)(1) bars importing, possessing, displaying, selling, trading or giving as a household pet "any living member of the animal kingdom, including those born or raised in captivity", except seven categories: domestic dogs, domestic cats, domesticated rodents and rabbits, captive-bred common cage birds, non-venomous snakes and fish and turtles, ferrets, and racing pigeons. No lizard, no amphibian and no invertebrate fits any of them. Read from the D.C. Code rather than from a reproduction: the seven categories and their exact wording are what every cell in this jurisdiction turns on.

D.C. Code § 8-1808(j), Prohibited conduct →

Hawaii

Banned§ 4-71-6.5, Restricted Animal List Part A
Tiliqua scincoides skink, blue-tongued

Part A is headed FOR RESEARCH AND EXHIBITION, so a listed animal has no pet route: a university or a licensed exhibitor can hold one and a private keeper cannot. Named individually. Several other Tiliqua are listed beside it, so the whole pet-trade group is covered rather than just this species.

How this rule works: Part A animals may be brought in by a university or a licensed exhibitor under permit and may not be kept as pets. Part B, published separately as AR-71RB, is the private and commercial use list and was checked as well: it runs to hoofed stock, giraffes, otters, seals, macropods and three named parrots, and contains none of the animals in this dataset.

Hawaii Administrative Rules § 4-71-6.5, List of Restricted Animals, Part A (research and exhibition) →

New Jersey

Permit requiredN.J.A.C. 7:25-4.3(a)3.x
Reptiles: ... x. Skinks - Family Scincidae;

The blue-tongue skink is answered by name on the 4.3 permit list rather than by the catch-all. The list takes the family whole, "Skinks - Family Scincidae", and Tiliqua scincoides is inside it. The list is written by family as often as by species, and 4.3 is open-ended, "include, but are not limited to", so being on it settles the permit question but not being on it settles nothing. The permit is the individual hobby permit at 4.6(a)1, subject to the general possession criteria at 4.7.

How this rule works: The Division's handout of the 4.3 permit list. It is open-ended, 'include, but are not limited to', and works by family as often as by species, so Pythonidae, Boidae, Lampropeltis, Varanus, Scincidae and Gekkonidae each answer several pet species at once.

N.J.A.C. 7:25-4.3 Exotic Species and Nongame species requiring a permit for possession →

West Virginia

Permit requiredW. Va. Code § 20-2-13; § 20-1-2; § 20-2-4(a), (b)
No person shall transport into or have in his possession within this state any live wildlife or viable eggs thereof from without the state, except as authorized by an importation permit issued by the director

West Virginia’s importation section is the rule the rest of this column was written without, and it changes the answer for every exotic reptile and amphibian in it. W. Va. Code § 20-1-2 builds wildlife out of wild birds, wild animals, game and fur-bearing animals, fish, reptiles, amphibians, mollusks, crustaceans and all forms of aquatic life used as fish bait. The reptile and amphibian clause carries no nativity qualifier and no captive-bred carve-out, so a pet reptile or amphibian bought from an out-of-state breeder is live wildlife from without the state. A blue-tongue skink is a reptile and an Australian and Indonesian species, so it is wildlife from without the state on any route into West Virginia. § 20-2-13 then bars both bringing that animal in and having it in possession within the state except under an importation permit from the director, and the permit is discretionary: the director may issue it, fix its terms and revoke it at his pleasure. How firm this is, both ways. § 20-2-4(a) independently makes it unlawful to take, obtain, purchase, possess or maintain in captivity any live wildlife except as the chapter or a rule provides, and § 20-2-4(b) says wildlife lawfully taken outside of this state is subject to the same laws and rules as wildlife taken within it, which closes the argument that an out-of-state origin puts the animal outside the chapter before it is made. Against that, the section is headed importation and certification and the body of it is disease control, fish pathologist certificates and inspection of imported shipments, with the only penalty clause written for coyotes. Nothing in Title 58 implements § 20-2-13 for anything but aquaculture, and WVDNR publishes no application for an importation permit. So this is a statutory permit requirement that is real on paper with its machinery not visibly in place, which is the same shape as the Minnesota breeder condition and is recorded the same way. Neither of West Virginia’s two species lists bars this animal. W. Va. C.S.R. § 74-1-3, the dangerous wild animal list adopted 5 April 2022, is a mammal list plus the Komodo dragon. W. Va. C.S.R. § 58-73 reaches native West Virginia reptiles and amphibians only.

How this rule works: West Virginia splits its animals by two definitions in one section. Wildlife takes in reptiles, amphibians, mollusks and crustaceans with no nativity limit and no terrestrial arthropod at all. Wild animals means all mammals native to the State of West Virginia, which is the phrase that decides every mammal here. § 20-2-4 bars possessing either except as the chapter or a rule provides, and § 20-2-51 is the only pet route, a two dollar permit from the director.

W. Va. Code § 20-1-2 (definitions), § 20-2-4 (possession of wildlife), § 20-2-13 (importation) and § 20-2-51 (permit for keeping pets) →

Maine

Conditions applyUnrestricted Species List, Reptilia, Sauria
All Species in Family Scincidae (Skinks) Family Scincidae*

A family-wide clearance with no species excepted. Tiliqua scincoides is IUCN Least Concern and on none of the four lists the asterisk points at. The whole Reptilia section of the list sits under the heading "Captive Bred Origin Only", which is the condition on the clearance: a wild-caught animal of the same species is not unrestricted and falls back to § 7.06(4), under which an uncategorised animal may not be possessed at all.

How this rule works: The list 12 M.R.S. § 12152(1-A) requires the department to maintain and 09-137 CMR ch. 7 § 7.06(1) describes: species needing no importation, exhibition, propagation, research or possession permit, which pet shops may also trade. Dated 11 August 2017 on every page, and this is the version IFW still serves. Three headings do most of the work: Reptilia, Serpentes and Testudines each carry "Captive Bred Origin Only", and an asterisk on an entry removes anything on the USFWS injurious or threatened and endangered lists, in CITES Appendix I, or on the IUCN Red List as Endangered, Critically Endangered or Extinct in the Wild.

Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife, Unrestricted Species List →

Minnesota

Conditions apply§ 97A.401, subd. 8
The commissioner must prescribe conditions and may issue permits to breed, propagate, and sell snakes, lizards, and salamanders. A snake, lizard, or salamander that is obtained from a permitted breeder or that was possessed before August 1, 2021, may be possessed as a pet.

Minnesota gets here in three steps, and the surprise is that none of them turns on the species being native. Section 97A.015, subd. 55 defines wild animals as creatures wild by nature and includes reptiles, with no geographic limit. Subd. 39 makes snakes, lizards and salamanders protected wild animals as whole categories. Section 97A.501, subd. 1 then bars possessing a protected wild animal unless the game and fish laws allow it, and this subdivision is the allowance. A blue-tongue skink is a lizard, so the breeder-source condition applies to it as much as to a Minnesota native. Two things to know about how firm this is. The statute says the commissioner "must" prescribe conditions, but there is no snake, lizard or salamander breeder permit on the DNR's permits page, Minnesota Rules chapter 6256 covers only frogs and turtles, and no rule chapter implements the subdivision. And the DNR's own pet-trade page describes the change as reaching "wild collected Minnesota snakes, lizards, and/or salamanders", which is narrower than the statute's words and does not mention the breeder permit at all. So the condition is real on paper and its machinery is not visibly in place.

How this rule works: Subd. 8, added in 2021, is the pet reptile rule: the commissioner must prescribe conditions and may issue breeder permits, and a snake, lizard or salamander is possessable as a pet if it came from a permitted breeder or was held before 1 August 2021. Subd. 3 is the older, broader route, allowing special permits without a fee to possess wild animals as pets.

Minn. Stat. § 97A.401, Special permits →

For the full write-up, including the states that get reported wrongly, read the blue-tongue skink legal guide.

Past the legal question? See the blue-tongue skink profile.

Cite this page

Every entry here is quoted from the statute or regulation it comes from, with the date it was last read against the published text.

How to read this

Two of the shades mean very different things and are worth telling apart. A flat grey state was read for this animal and nothing in it restricts one. A dotted state has not been read for this animal at all. Coverage runs from two jurisdictions to fifty-one depending on the species, so on a less-researched animal most of the map is a gap in our work rather than a finding, and it should not be taken as permission.

Even a flat grey is not a guarantee. It means no restriction was found in the specific body of law checked for that state, which is recorded alongside each jurisdiction. Cities and counties regularly ban animals their state allows, and several states say so in their own rules.

Hatched grey means the rule genuinely does not resolve. Usually a definition arguably reaches the animal without naming it, and the honest answer is to ask the agency rather than to guess. Those entries are marked unclear on purpose rather than being rounded to a yes or a no.

Every entry links to the regulation it came from. None of this is legal advice, laws change without much notice, and the agency that issues the permit is always the last word. For the federal layer and how state schemes are structured, see the exotic pet legal hub.